1. Baranova DV, Belousov AO, Pavlova VA. Avtomatizatsiya raschetov integral'noi otsenki ratsional'nogo ispol'zovaniya zemel' sel'skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya (na primere Novgorodskoi oblasti) [Automation of Calculations of the Integrated Assessment of the Rational Use of Agricultural Land (Using the Example of the Novgorod Region)]. Izvestia Vuzov. Geodesy and Aerophotosurveying. 2025;69(3): 122–135. (In Russian). DOIhttps://doi.org/10.30533/GiA-2025-031. https://miigaik.ru/journal/archive/2025/2025_69_3_RU/GiA-2025-031.pdf

2. Lupian EA, Proshin AA, Burtsev MA, et al. Sistema “VEGA-Science”: vozmozhnosti raboty s dannymi sputnikovykh nablyudenii Zemli dlya resheniya nauchnykh i prikladnykh zadach [VEGA-Science System: Capabilities for Working with Earth Observation Satellite Data to Address Scientific and Applied Problems]. Earth & Universe. 2025;1-2(361-362): 66–85. (In Russian). DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7868/S0044394825010050. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0044394825010050

3. Tetteh G, Gocht A, Erasmi S, et al. Evaluation of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Feature Sets for Delineating Agricultural Fields in Heterogeneous Landscapes. IEEE Access. 2021;9: 116702 116719. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3105903. https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn063902.pdf

4. Baldina EA, Mikhaylyukova PG, Troshko KA. Opyt ispol'zovaniya dannykh radiolokatsionnoi kosmicheskoi s"emki dlya sozdaniya tematicheskikh kart [Experience of Using Radar Satellite Imagery Data to Create Thematic Maps]. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5, Geography. 2019;4: 110–118. (In Russian).

5. Minaev AS, Fedorov VV. Obratimaya mnogoshagovaya diffuzionnaya model' dlya preobrazovaniya izobrazhenii na osnove radiolokatsionnykh i opticheskikh dannykh [Reversible Multi-Step Diffusion Model for Image Translation Between Radar and Optical Data]. Vestnik Natsional'nogo Issledovatel'skogo Yadernogo Universiteta “MIFI”. 2025;14(3): 249–255. (In Russian). DOIhttps://doi.org/10.26583/vestnik.2025.3.7. https://doi.org/10.26583/vestnik.2025.3.7

6. Shiryaev MA, Baldina EA, Lurie IK. Ispol'zovanie interferometricheskikh dannykh so sputnika Sentinel-1A dlya vyyavleniya izmenenii vysoty poverkhnosti Uzon-Geizernoi vulkano-tektonicheskoi depressii [Use of the Sentinel-1A Satellite DInSAR Data for Surface Elevation Changes Detection of the Uzon-Geyservolcano-Tectonic Depression]. Izvestia Vuzov. Geodesy and Aerophotosurveying. 2024;68(3): 42–56. (In Russian). DOIhttps://doi.org/10.30533/GiA-2024-022. https://miigaik.ru/journal/archive/2024/2024_68_3_RU/GiA-2024-022.pdf

7. Egoshkin NA, Eremeev VV, Kozlov EP, et al. Povyshenie informativnosti kosmicheskikh izobrazhenii Zemli [Increasing the Information Content of Satellite Images of the Earth] [monograph]. Eremeev VV. (ed.). Moscow: KURS; 2021. 368 p. (In Russian).

8. Nafieva EN, Grechishchev AV. Kosmicheskie radiolokatsionnye sistemy monitoringa Zemli [Space Radar Systems of Earth Monitoring]. Ecology Economy Informatics. Geoinformation Technologies and Space Monitoring. 2020;2(5): 89–95. (In Russian). DOIhttps://doi.org/10.23885/2500-123X-2020-2-5-89-95. https://doi.org/10.23885/2500-123X-2020-2-5-89-95

9. Lopez-Martinez C, Fabregas X, Pottier E. Multidimensional Speckle Noise Model. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing. 2005;2005: 180956. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1155/ASP.2005.3259. https://doi.org/10.1155/ASP.2005.3259

10. Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, et al. Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2007;16(8): 2080–2095. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2007.901238. https://www.sci-hub.ru/10.1109/tip.2007.901238

11. Perera M, Bandara W, Valanarasu J, et al. Transformer-Based SAR Image Despeckling. IGARSS 2022–2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Kuala Lumpur: IEEE; 2022: 751 754. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS46834.2022.9884596. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.09355

12. MuraliMohanBabu Y, Subramanyam M, GiriPrasad M. A Modified BM3D Algorithm for SAR Image Despeckling. Procedia Computer Science. 2015;70: 69–75. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.10.038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.10.038.

13. Wang X, Ge L, Li X. Evaluation of Filters for Envisat Asar Speckle Suppression in Pasture Area. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2012;I-7: 341–346. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-I-7-341-2012. https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/I-7/341/2012/isprsannals-I-7-341-2012.pdf

14. Sennikov AV, Larionov RV, Khryashchev VV, et al. Issledovanie neirosetevykh algoritmov dlya segmentatsii vodnykh uchastkov na sputnikovykh SAR izobrazheniyakh [Investigation of Neural Network Algorithms for Segmentation of Water Areas on Satellite SAR Images]. Digital Signal Processing. 2024;4: 83–88. (In Russian).

15. Guo M, Lu C, Hou Q, et al. SegNeXt: Rethinking Convolutional Attention Design for Semantic Segmentation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35: Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022). Red Hook: Curran Associates; 2022: 1140–1156. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.52202/068431-0084. https://www.proceedings.com/content/068/068431-0084open.pdf

16. Hanyu T, Yamazaki K, Tran M, et al. AerialFormer: Multi-Resolution Transformer for Aerial Image Segmentation. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(16): 2930. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162930.

17. Setiawan AW Image Segmentation Metrics in Skin Lesion: Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Dice Coefficient, Jaccard Index, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient. 2020 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM). Surabaya: IEEE; 2020: 97–102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/CENIM51130.2020.9297970. https://doi.org/10.1109/CENIM51130.2020.9297970.

18. Larionov R, Kotov N, Priorov A, et al. Agricultural Fields Segmentation on Satellite Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks. 2021 IEEE East-West Design and Test Symposium. Batumi: IEEE; 2021: 1–4. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1109/EWDTS52692.2021.9581006. https://doi.org/10.1109/EWDTS52692.2021.9581006

19. Bekhtin YuS, Trinh VT. Sravnenie ehffektivnosti razlichnykh tipov veivletov pri shumopodavlenii izobrazhenii, poluchennykh s pomoshch'yu radarov s sintezirovannoi aperturoi [Comparison of the Efficiency of Different Types of Wavelets in Noise Reduction of Images Obtained with Synthetic Aperture Radars]. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoi nauki i proizvodstva: Proceedings of the IX All-Russian Scientific and Technical Conference. Ryazan: RSREU; 2024: 342–349. (In Russian).

20. Wang J, Sun K, Cheng T, et al. Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 2021;43(10): 3349–3364. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2983686. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2983686