VAK Russia 1.6.22 UDC 528.01/.06 CSCSTI 36.23

LOCAL MONITORING OF IONOSPHERIC PARAMETERS IN THE POLAR REGION BASED ON GNSS OBSERVATIONS Local Monitoring of Ionospheric Parameters in the Polar Region Based on GNSS Observations

Published in Izvestia Vuzov. Geodesy and Aerophotosurveying · Volume 70, Issue 1 · Pages 12–28 · Rubric: Geodesy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30533/GiA-2026-001
Received: 05.08.2025 Accepted: 20.02.2026 Published: 27.02.2026 Language of publication: RUS
The paper considers local modeling of the ionosphere in the polar region based on GNSS observations at permanent FAGS and IGS stations. The methodology of joint use of stations belonging to different networks for local monitoring of complete electronic content is presented. The results of monitoring in the area from 10° to 50° in longitude and from 65° to 75° in latitude for the time period 07/9/2020 to 07/16/2020 are presented. 8 GNSS observation stations located inside and in the vicinity of this area were used for monitoring. Local models of the spatial distribution of the vertical total electronic content in the form of Taylor series expansion parameters are obtained. The average square error for the central point of the model averaged 0.12 TECU, and the maximum value was 0.16 TECU. During the time period under review, intense ionospheric disturbances were observed, expressed in a sharp change in the total electronic content, which was previously associated with the passage of an auroral oval through the region under consideration. To confirm this hypothesis, data from the DMSP-F18 spacecraft was analyzed and it was found that during the observation period of the disturbances, the auroral oval passed directly through the region under consideration and a high intensity of disturbances was observed. It is determined that during the passage of an auroral disturbance, the variability of the vertical total electronic content increases by an average of 4.9 times.
ionospheric parameter monitoring, local ionospheric model, polar ionosphere, total electron content, ionospheric scintillation
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Solov'ev K.V., Shaydulin Z.F. Usovershenstvovannyy algoritm rascheta parametrov ionosfery Arkticheskoy zony // Nauchnaya mysl'. 2018. T. 4, № 2 (28). S. 135–140.

2. Dem'yanov V.V., Yasyukevich Yu.V., Kashkina T.V. i dr. Eksperimental'nye nablyudeniya uskoreniya fazy nesuschey v usloviyah polyarnoy ionosfery // Radiotehnika i elektronika. 2016. T. 61, № 10. S. 946–951. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7868/S0033849416100089. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0033849416100089

3. Papyrin V.V., Sidorov V.K. Problemy organizacii korotkovolnovoy radiosvyazi v Arktike i vozmozhnye puti ih resheniya // Nauchno-analiticheskiy zhurnal «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Gosudarstvennoy protivopozharnoy sluzhby MChS Rossii». 2020. № 1. S. 1–4.

4. Kuleshov I.A., Solozobov S.A., Shevchenko V.V. Problemy radiosvyazi v Arktike // Tehnika sredstv svyazi. 2018. № 3 (143). S. 21–31.

5. Kuz'michev A.P. Problemy organizacii svyazi s trudnodostupnymi i polyarnymi stanciyami // Rossiyskie polyarnye issledovaniya. 2014. № 3 (17). S. 24–27.

6. Hernández-Pajares M., Juan J.M., Sanz J., et al. The IGS VTEC Maps: A Reliable Source of Ionospheric Information since 1998 // Journal of Geodesy. 2009. Vol. 83. P. 263–275. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1

7. Abdelazeem M., Celik R.N., El-Rabbany A. An Enhanced Real-Time Regional Ionospheric Model Using IGS Real-Time Service (IGS-RTS) Products // Journal of Navigation. 2016. Vol. 69. Iss. 3. P. 521–530. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463315000740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463315000740

8. Liu H., Ren X., Xu G. Investigating the Performance of IGS Real-Time Global Ionospheric Maps under Different Solar Conditions // Remote Sensing. 2023. Vol. 15. Iss. 19. P. 4661. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194661. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194661

9. Shepel' V.I., Ergaliev D.S., Tulegulov A.D. Sravnitel'nyy analiz global'nyh navigacionnyh sputnikovyh sistem // Nadezhnost' i kachestvo: trudy Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma: v 2 t. Penza: PGU, 2012. T. 1. S. 469–470.

10. Wu Q., Zhang P., Sun M., et al. Performance Evaluation of Gims Released by Different IGS Ionosphere Associate Analysis Centers in Ionospheric Constrained Single-Frequency Precise Point Positioning // Advances in Space Research. 2021. Vol. 68. Iss. 12. P. 4834–4856. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.12.006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.12.006

11. Montenbruck O., Hauschild A., Steigenberger P. Differential Code Bias Estimation Using Multi-GNSS Observations and Global Ionosphere Maps // Navigation. 2014. Vol. 61. No. 3. P. 191–201.

12. Gulyaeva T.L., Arikan F., Hernandez-Pajares M., et al. GIM-TEC Adaptive Ionospheric Weather Assessment and Forecast System // Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics. 2013. Vol. 102. P. 329–340.

13. Ajello J.M., Evans J.S., Veibell V., et al. The UV Spectrum of the Lyman-Birge-Hopfield Band System of N2 Induced by Cascading from Electron Impact // Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2020. Vol. 125. Iss. 3. P. e2019JA027546. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027546. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027546

14. Nesterov I.A., Padohin A.M., Andreeva E.S. i dr. Modelirovanie zadachi nizkoorbital'noy sputnikovoy UF-tomografii ionosfery // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Fizika. Astronomiya. 2016. № 3. C. 90–99.

15. Pavlov I.A., Padohin A.M. Rekonstrukciya regional'nyh raspredeleniy elektronnoy koncentracii v ionosfere po raznorodnym dannym distancionnogo zondirovaniya // Vestnik KRAUNC. Fiziko-matematicheskie nauki. 2023. T. 45, № 4. C. 95–108. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.26117/2079-6641-2023-45-4-95-108. https://doi.org/10.26117/2079-6641-2023-45-4-95-108